Using the network would be the fastest way. If no communication can be made in a decent timeframe, considering the circumstances, we should think of other options.
Network first. Anyone who hasn't responded in a certain timeframe, we may be able to tap the first responders for information. Otherwise, it will just be trying to track them down on foot using the tracking system.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Understood. I'll send along a list of my half here in a moment.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Not at all. Did you have a plan in mind?
no subject
Using the network would be the fastest way. If no communication can be made in a decent timeframe, considering the circumstances, we should think of other options.
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
We can split the unit between us.
no subject
Network first. Anyone who hasn't responded in a certain timeframe, we may be able to tap the first responders for information. Otherwise, it will just be trying to track them down on foot using the tracking system.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Understood. I'll send along a list of my half here in a moment.
no subject
I believe that would be wise. My tracker has an extended range, if we need to use it. That should help us cover ground more quickly.
no subject
That sounds like it will come in handy. Once we've compiled non-responders, we can take measures. I'll keep you updated.
no subject
Of course. I appreciate the help. Both of us should continue to keep in contact with other Red leaders, as well as those from other teams.
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
We don't yet know how long the list of the missing may be.
no subject
Most certainly. I've already heard from both Kakashi and Miss Jacobs.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
If all team leaders are supposed to be contacting each other, I still haven't heard anything from Li Shengshun. A potential missing.
no subject
I have heard from the two of them as well, but no one else yet.
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
How much time should we give people to respond?
no subject
Perhaps they have their hands full.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Does 15 minutes sound unreasonable?
[ He'd prefer it to be five, considering what's going on, but that's probably a little too paranoid. ]
no subject
If by that you mean they're contacting their own unit, I'm fine with that.
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
I would have preferred five. But fifteen is fair.
[ Sorry, November. ]
no subject
I'd like to think that's what they're doing. I don't have my doubts there, too much.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Taking the influx into consideration, of course. Five would be better if things weren't starting to get close to chaotic.
[ Bunny...... you could've said five and he would've rolled with it. Actual twins. ]
no subject
Neither do I. Red ended up with competent leaders.
[ And then there's Loki. Who introduces people to Spongebob. ]
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
That's true. For all we know, the situation could worsen at any moment. Giving them some time would be fair.
no subject
Thankfully, especially in this current course.
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
no subject
Is it not an expectation when it comes to the CDC?
no subject
Sometimes, I'm not even sure what to expect.
no subject
We may be better off exercising caution at every turn.
no subject
Should be standard procedure, at this point.
no subject
If we prepare for the worst, perhaps we'll be pleasantly surprised.
no subject
Or we'll be dead, even so.
[ Welp. ]
no subject
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe death eliminates the need for any further concerns.
no subject
You're not wrong. It does.
no subject
I can't decide if it's fortunate or unfortunate.
no subject
Dying, in most cases, is never fortunate. Useful, perhaps. Fortunate, no.
no subject
I meant having no troubles, though at such a cost it wouldn't be worth it.
FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org
I understand that from experience.
no subject
You know, there are some that would argue that case.
[ Not him, of course. ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)