03. IC || Voicemail

[justttkidding]

 

11.november@cdc.org
(11) UNREAD MESSAGES

CONTACTS

INBOX

CALL LOG

DOWNLOADS

text message	audio message	voice mail
<span style="font-family:courier;"> <b>SUBJECT:</B> TEXT <b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <b>FROM:</B> SURNAME.NAME@cdc.org <b>TO:</b> 11.november@cdc.org [[200 max character message here]]</span>	<span style="font-family:courier;><b>SENT:</B> DAY#, HOUR <B>CALL ID:</B> NHD-C12-NOV-044</span> [[3 minute max message here]]	<span style="font-family:courier;"><b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <B>( 1 ) VOICEMAIL</B> 11, NOVEMBER [[3 minute max message here]]</span>

Comments

[retry]

[ If you're not yet, November, you will be . . . ]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

No one can lose their emotions.

[justttkidding]

[ stop threatening him okay play nice ]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I don't think that's how it works. Regardless, we don't function the same as before.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

We don't. I don't know how or why but it's wrong to say they're gone.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Misplaced. To be found at a later date. Something like that.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

"To be found at a later date"? That sounds ridiculous.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

More ridiculous than a fake sky and gates that lead nowhere?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

There's not enough conclusive evidence to say they lead nowhere.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Is there conclusive evidence to say we feel nothing?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Multiple accounts. Do you not remember how it was when you first became a Contractor?

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

That was so long ago.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

It only takes one emotional Contractor to disprove the claim that we all lack affect.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Not that long ago.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Wouldn't that be seen as an anomaly rather than a potential norm?

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

It has been a very, very long time for me.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

No. It proves potential in what the scientists deem impossible.

[justttkidding]

[ Oh yeah that's right you're 3,000 years old huh ]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

How many times have you lived and re-lived?


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

One instance isn't enough proof for a trend, regardless.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Many times. Why does the number matter?

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Not a trend, but-- a beginning.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

It's something to factor in.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

They call that a trendsetter you know.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Just pick a number.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

That has positive connotations, doesn't it?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

On a scale from 1-10 how offended will you be if it's over 1,000?


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Depends on the trend; have you ever heard of crocs?

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Why would I be offended?

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Crocodiles...?

[justttkidding]

[ Look you're weirdly emotional he doesn't know what to do with you. Also, British. ]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Asking out of reflex more than anything.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Crocs. They're a type of shoe and they're hideous.

[retry]

[ Wow you're so grossly polite. Stop. ]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

I won't be. I did tell you to pick a number.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

I always needed someone to dress me, but you know that.

[justttkidding]

[ nah ]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Somewhere in the 2400 range.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I'm acutely aware, yes.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

Let's go with that.

FROM: amber@cdc.org

):

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

You have seen your wardrobe, right?

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

We have the same uniform!!!

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Oh come now, don't play dense. I'm not sure what you were thinking when you put that pink atrocity on.

[retry]

FROM: amber@cdc.org

What if I said your beloved Amagiri picked it for me?