03. IC || Voicemail

[justttkidding]

 

11.november@cdc.org
(11) UNREAD MESSAGES

CONTACTS

INBOX

CALL LOG

DOWNLOADS

text message	audio message	voice mail
<span style="font-family:courier;"> <b>SUBJECT:</B> TEXT <b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <b>FROM:</B> SURNAME.NAME@cdc.org <b>TO:</b> 11.november@cdc.org [[200 max character message here]]</span>	<span style="font-family:courier;><b>SENT:</B> DAY#, HOUR <B>CALL ID:</B> NHD-C12-NOV-044</span> [[3 minute max message here]]	<span style="font-family:courier;"><b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <B>( 1 ) VOICEMAIL</B> 11, NOVEMBER [[3 minute max message here]]</span>

Comments

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

No, mine remains much the same.

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

What about yours?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

A couple new additions, nothing too exciting.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

It should be interesting, however, to see how Mr D'Artagnan adjusts.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Should I send him a sympathy card, since he has to deal with you corrupting him?

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Who were your other additions?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I'm on my best behaviour...for now. So yes, he may need one.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Miss Kirihara, surprisingly.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Won't that be awkward?

[ Thank you for pointing out the obvious, Barnaby. ]

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I've lived with women before; why would this be awkward?

[ IT REALLY IS MAKE IT STOP ]

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Ones that you have such an attachment to?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

You really like to try and apply that word to Contractors, don't you.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

You're not the only one I've observed that behaviour in. So, yes.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

If you're going to compare me to Amber, I'm going to stop you right here.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

I wasn't.

[ Not out loud. In his head? Maybe. ]

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Somehow, I don't believe you.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Regardless, she is hardly the issue here. What do you intend to do now?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

What do you mean by that? There's not really anything so different.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Do you expect me to believe that?

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Why the disbelief? We've worked together in the past.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

I'm hardly concerned in a professional capacity.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

So you're concerned in a personal capacity, is that it?

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

I'm not sure what other capacities are left.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I'm just in disbelief. Why?

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Perhaps it amuses the instructors.

[justttkidding]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Dagger would be more amused if there was a fight to the death.


FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

I was more asking why you're so concerned.

[ex_nearsighted397]

[ Have you forgotten the end of Ajna already, November. ]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Is it not self-explanatory?

[justttkidding]

[ Listen he hadn't paid his price give him a break !!! ]

FROM: 11.november@cdc.org

Enlighten me, oh concerned one. Regardless, I don't think it'll be an issue.

[ex_nearsighted397]

FROM: brooksjr.barnaby@cdc.org

Do I need to point out that your relationship technically has crossed professional boundaries?