Skip to Main Content
november "james blonde" 11 (
justttkidding
) wrote
2014
-
04
-
28
05:50 am
Entry tags:
ic contact
03. IC || Voicemail
11.november@cdc.org
(11) UNREAD MESSAGES
CONTACTS
INBOX
CALL LOG
DOWNLOADS
text message
audio message
voice mail
<span style="font-family:courier;"> <b>SUBJECT:</B> TEXT <b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <b>FROM:</B> SURNAME.NAME@cdc.org <b>TO:</b> 11.november@cdc.org [[200 max character message here]]</span>
<span style="font-family:courier;><b>SENT:</B> DAY#, HOUR <B>CALL ID:</B> NHD-C12-NOV-044</span> [[3 minute max message here]]
<span style="font-family:courier;"><b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <B>( 1 ) VOICEMAIL</B> 11, NOVEMBER [[3 minute max message here]]</span>
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
sequestrated
2014-06-27 09:59 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
wilson.simon@cdc.org
TO:
11.november@cdc.org
Call it pragmatism. They listen to you. They don't listen to me. And yes, I know that's my fault.
But it isn't hers. Please.
no subject
justttkidding
2014-06-28 06:21 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
TO: wilson.simon@cdc.org
It still seems like overreaction under the guise of pragmatism. Moreover, you should know by now that attempting to guilt me isn't going to work.
no subject
sequestrated
2014-06-28 01:31 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
[If only they still shared a rover. Simon would be more than prepared to yell at him by now.]
FROM:
wilson.simon@cdc.org
TO:
11.november@cdc.org
So you think there is no problem, and that I shouldn't report concerns I have?
I trust your judgement. It's possible I am overreacting. It's also possible her location should be confirmed, isn't it?
no subject
justttkidding
2014-06-30 04:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
TO: wilson.simon@cdc.org
You trust my judgment and in the same sentence, you question it. How contradictory.
no subject
sequestrated
2014-06-30 11:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
wilson.simon@cdc.org
TO:
11.november@cdc.org
Humans are.
[Zing. Totally ineffective, but it felt good.]
I'm just trying to cover all possibilities. I'm leaving it with you now. Do as you see fit.
no subject
justttkidding
2014-06-30 04:29 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM: 11.november@cdc.org
Your sufferance, I suppose.
[and he's not answering the latter half. As far as he's concerned (which isn't much at all), this conversation has run its course.]
1538 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
TO: 11.november@cdc.org
Call it pragmatism. They listen to you. They don't listen to me. And yes, I know that's my fault.
But it isn't hers. Please.
no subject
TO: wilson.simon@cdc.org
It still seems like overreaction under the guise of pragmatism. Moreover, you should know by now that attempting to guilt me isn't going to work.
no subject
FROM: wilson.simon@cdc.org
TO: 11.november@cdc.org
So you think there is no problem, and that I shouldn't report concerns I have?
I trust your judgement. It's possible I am overreacting. It's also possible her location should be confirmed, isn't it?
no subject
TO: wilson.simon@cdc.org
You trust my judgment and in the same sentence, you question it. How contradictory.
no subject
TO: 11.november@cdc.org
Humans are. [Zing. Totally ineffective, but it felt good.]
I'm just trying to cover all possibilities. I'm leaving it with you now. Do as you see fit.
no subject
Your sufferance, I suppose.
[and he's not answering the latter half. As far as he's concerned (which isn't much at all), this conversation has run its course.]